Recently a member of a think tank said we need better transportation and we need to leapfrog the Ethanol Cars, Hybrids and Electric Cars all together. When asked to define what he meant well he said we are investing in the wrong vehicles is all. We need to look into all these others, but also think beyond these up and coming technologies.
Indeed, he was starting to make a lot of sense really and so another member piped into the conversation and said; I vote for a Wind Car which charges while flying from the relative wind and when using air-brakes. It will use a combination of waves to thicken the air through molecular re-alignment. Then blow low pressure on the thickened air to float along. Made out of lightweight materials like carbon nanotube structure with an oxygen molecule riding inside each tube the vibrational energy will provide all the power to the LED instrumentation.
Wow, now we are talking a whole new ball game, new league, different stadium and technology, which could literally be used out of this world. But is any of this truly feasible with our current technologies$%: Let us look at each point. A wind car, is that feasible$%: Well if it is light enough and there is wind, sure it is, providing it has surface area or can use the relative wind for such purposes as propulsion.
Entries:
Your teensy internal organ ::Of to coping ::Here is a new
Is it possible to thicken air with molecular re-alignment$%: Yes, that can be done, it is however an issue of power needed. Will low-pressure under a vehicle lift it up$%: Indeed, this is how hovercraft operate so those types of features would need to be integrated. Is carbon nano-tube construction lightweight enough$%: Yes. Can vibrational energy run LED lights and instrumentation$%: Well sure it can and we are doing this now of course.
Our Online Think Tank specializes in propelling thought and we hope this hypothetical idea and concept might help propel thought in you mind in 2007.
留言列表
